Exploring Science Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices toward Scientific Argumentation in Science Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.1942Keywords:
Scientific argumentation, Secondary science teachers, Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticesAbstract
Scientific argumentation has gained increasing attention as a powerful inquiry-based strategy that fosters students’ scientific literacy, critical thinking, and engagement with evidence-based reasoning—skills that are vital in today’s complex, information-rich world. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of secondary science teachers (SSTs) in Central Luzon, Philippines, regarding scientific argumentation within the evolving context of blended and remote learning environments. Using a mixed-methods descriptive research design, data were gathered from 190 SSTs through a validated self-reported survey (α = .81) and open-ended responses. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis, while qualitative responses were thematically examined using Quirkos software. Findings revealed that SSTs possess a very high level of knowledge of scientific argumentation, hold generally favorable attitudes—especially in terms of motivation and classroom engagement—and implement argumentation strategies to a great extent in their teaching. However, significant differences emerged based on demographic factors such as teaching experience, sex, and school type. Furthermore, strong positive correlations were found among teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices, highlighting the need for targeted professional development. Notably, limited resources and insufficient access to training emerged as barriers to consistent implementation. This study offers timely insights for policymakers, curriculum developers, and educators worldwide who are seeking to strengthen STEM education through discourse-rich, student-centered pedagogies. It underscores the importance of sustained teacher support, curriculum alignment, and resource accessibility in embedding scientific argumentation within diverse and increasingly digital learning landscapes.
References
Antonio, R.P. (2025). Exploring science teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward scientific argumentation in science education. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 7(4), 748-779. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.1942
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal on Studies in Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.