Artificial Intelligence in the Scientific Research Process: The Views of Academics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.5319

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Scientific research, Academics, Social studies education

Abstract

This study aims to determine the opinions of academics in the field of Social Sciences Education regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process. The study was conducted with 26 academics working in the field of Social Sciences Education at state universities. Within the scope of the research objective, qualitative research processes are utilized, and a case study design of the situation analysis type is employed. Participants who volunteered to participate in the data collection process were selected using the convenient sampling method. A semi-structured interview form prepared by the researchers was used to obtain the academics' views on the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process. The trial form of the semi-structured interview, used as a data collection tool, was previously submitted to three field experts for their opinions. The first section of the form contains personal information, while the second section contains interview questions. The data obtained were analyzed and reported using descriptive analysis and content analysis techniques. Based on the study's findings, it was concluded that artificial intelligence is utilized in scientific research processes, including literature review, editing, control, and translation. The study also found that the use of artificial intelligence tools is efficient and facilitates research processes. However, it was also concluded that the use of artificial intelligence, especially in terms of ethical and security dimensions, can lead to problems and results in issues such as plagiarism. 

References

Alanoğlu, M. & Karabatak, S. (2020). Eğitimde yapay zekâ. Eğitim Araştırmaları içinde (Ed. F. Güçlü Yılmaz ve M. Naillioğlu Kaymak), 175-185.

Armstrong, C. (2021). Key methods used in qualitative document analysis. OSF Preprints, 1(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.399 6213

Arslan, K. (2020). Eğitimde yapay zeka ve uygulamaları. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 71-88. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1174773

Atıf Seyhan, A. (2024). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin eğitimde yapay zeka kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(41), 100-125. https://doi.org/10.29228/INESJOURNAL.78798

Bahammam, A. S., Trabelsi, K., Pandi-Perumal, S. R. & Jahrami, H. (2023). Adapting to the impact of artificial intelligence in scientific writing: balancing benefits and drawbacks while developing policies and regulations. Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine, 6(3), https://doi.org/152-158. 10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_89_23

Bianchini, S., Müller, M. & Pelletier, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in science: An emerging general method of invention. Research Policy, 51(10), 104604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104604

Bozkurt, A. (2023). ChatGPT, üretken yapay zeka ve algoritmik paradigma biçimliği. Alanyazın, 4(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.59320/alanyazin.1283282.

Buholayka, M., Zouabi, R. & Tadinada, A. (2023). The readiness of ChatGPT to write scientific case reports independently: A comparative evaluation between human and artificial intelligence. Cureus, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39386

Cheng, H. W. (2023). Challenges and limitations of ChatGPT and artificial intelligence for scientific research: a perspective from organic materials. Ai, 4(2), 401-405. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai4020021

Chirichela, I. A., Mariani, A. W. & Pêgo-Fernandes, P. M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in scientific writing. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 142(5), e20241425. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2024.1425.26062024

Çetin, M. & Aktaş, A. (2021). Yapay zeka ve eğitimde gelecek senaryoları. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(Eğitim Bilimleri Özel Sayısı), 4225-4268. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.911444

Dündar, R., Yeşilyurt, S., Demir, R. Z. & Yeşilyurt, A. G. (2025). Üretken yapay zekâ araçları ile sosyal bilgiler öğretimi: avantajlar ve dezavantajlar. Disiplinlerarası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(20), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.57135/jier.1594253

Elbadawi, M., Li, H., Basit, A. W. & Gaisford, S. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in generating original scientific research. International journal of pharmaceutics, 652, 123741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123741

Ertel, W. (2024). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Springer Nature.

Floridi, L. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities.

França, C. (2023). AI empowering research: 10 ways how science can benefit from AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10265. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.10265

González-Esteban y Patrici Calvo, E. (2022). Ethically governing artificial intelligence in the field of scientific research and innovation. Heliyon, 8, e08946.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08946

Güzey, C., Çakır, O., Athar, M. H. & Yurdaöz, E. (2023). Eğitimde yapay zekâ üzerine gerçekleştirilmiş araştırmalardaki eğilimlerin incelenmesi. Bilgi Ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 5(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.53694/bited.1060730

Haenlein, M. & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California management review, 61(4), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925

Hammad, M. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) programs on writing scientific research. Annals of biomedical engineering, 51(3), 459-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1

Heale, R. & Twycross, A. (2018). What is a casestudy? Evidence-Based Nursing, 21(1), 7-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102845

Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., & Holmes, K. (2023). The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19(4), 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449

Huang, C., Zhang, Z., Mao, B. & Yao, X. (2023). An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Ethics. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 4(4), 799-819. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2022.3194503.

İncemen, S. & Öztürk, G. (2024). Farklı eğitim alanlarında yapay zekâ: uygulama örnekleri. International Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12600022

İşler, B. & Kılıç, M. (2021). Eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımı ve gelişimi. Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17932/IAU.EJNM.25480200.2021/ejnm_v5i1001

Krenn, M., Pollice, R., Guo, S. Y., Aldeghi, M., Cervera-Lierta, A., Friederich, P., ... & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2022). On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence. Nature Reviews Physics, 4(12), 761-769. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.01467

Küçük, O. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 1. Baskı. Ekin Yayınevi.

Lin, Z. (2024). Beyond principlism: practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices. AI and Ethics, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00585-5

Long, D. & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Love, P. (2003). Document Analysis. In Research in The Collage Context. Approaches and Methods. Ed. F. K. Stage & K. Manning. Routledge.

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N. & Shannon, C. E. (2006). A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, august 31, 1955. AI magazine, 27(4), 12-12. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904

Messeri, L. & Crockett, M. J. (2024). Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research. Nature, 627(8002), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (Second Edition). Sage Publications.

Musib, M., Wang, F., Tarselli, M. A., Yoho, R., Yu, K. H., Andrés, R. M., ... & Sharafeldin, I. M. (2017). Artificial intelligence in research. Science, 357(6346), 28-30. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.357.6346.28

Pirim, A. G. H. (2006). Yapay zeka. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 1(1), 81-93. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/179113

Resnik, D.B. & Hosseini, M. (2024). The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool. AI Ethics 5, 1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8

Russell, S. J. & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Russell, S. J. & Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S. & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?. Critical care, 27(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2

Seyrek, M., Yıldız, S., Emeksiz, H., Şahin, A. & Türkmen, M. T. (2024). Öğretmenlerin eğitimde yapay zeka kullanımına yönelik algıları. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 11(106), 845-856. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11113077

Torre-López, J., Ramírez, A. & Romero, J. R. (2023). Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature. Computing, 105(10), 2171-2194. Computing (2023) 105:2171–2194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-023-01181-x

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460.

Uzun, Y., Tümtürk, A. Y. & Öztürk, H. (2021). Günümüzde ve gelecekte eğitim alanında kullanılan yapay zekâ. In 1st International Conference on Applied Engineering and Natural Sciences (pp. 1-3).

Vishnevsky, T. & Beanlands, H. (2004). Qualitative research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 31(2), 234-238.

Waly, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and Scientific Research. Sustainability Education Globe, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21608/seg.2024.269596.1001

Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., ... & Zhang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The Innovation, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179

Ye, R., Varona, M., Huang, O., Lee, P. Y. K., Liut, M., & Nobre, C. (2025). The Design Space of Recent AI-assisted Research Tools for Ideation, Sensemaking, and Scientific Creativity. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.16291

Yeşilyurt, S., Dündar, R. & Aydın, M. (2024). Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi alanında lisansüstü eğitimini sürdüren öğrencilerin yapay zekâ hakkındaki görüşleri. Asya Studies, 8(27), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.1406649

Yeşilyurt, S., Dündar, R., Demir, R. Z. & Yeşilyurt, A. G. (2025). Üretken yapay zekâ araçları ile sosyal bilgiler öğretimi: avantajlar ve dezavantajlar, Disiplinlerarası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(20), 1-16, https://doi.org/10.57135/jier.1594253

Yetişensoy, O. (2022). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde yapay zekâ uygulaması örneği olarak chatbotların kullanımı. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Eskişehir.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınevi.

Yılmaz, D. Ö. Ü. A. (2021). Yapay zekâ. Kodlab Yayın Dağıtım Yazılım Ltd. Şti. Retrieved on 10.07.2025 from https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=JsoqEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=%22yapay+zeka%22&ots=8LZQUQbRyV&sig=3g82ghoKIPdKMOXOb6XtNmSZcrk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22yapay%20zeka%22&f=false

Zheng, T., Deng, Z., Tsang, H. T., Wang, W., Bai, J., Wang, Z., & Song, Y. (2025). From automation to autonomy: A survey on large language models in scientific discovery. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.13259

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence in the Scientific Research Process: The Views of Academics. (2026). International Journal on Studies in Education, 8(1), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.5319