Innovative Approaches to Cognitive Assessment in Children with Special Needs: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.5740Keywords:
Cognitive assessment, Children with special needs, Innovative approaches, Dynamic assessmentsAbstract
Cognitive assessment is essential for enhancing educational outcomes for children with special needs, as it identifies individual learning requirements and informs tailored interventions. This systematic literature review aims to synthesize empirical studies focusing on innovative cognitive assessment for children with special need methodologies from 2000 to 2025. Utilizing a structured approach, the review analyzes studies that explore various assessment techniques, including technology-driven tools and dynamic assessments. The findings reveal significant advancements in cognitive assessment practices, highlighting innovative approaches such as game-based assessments and dynamic learning maps that actively engage children and promote cognitive development. These methods not only assess cognitive abilities but also align with the principles of individualized education plans, ensuring that educational strategies are tailored to each child's unique strengths and weaknesses. However, critical gaps persist in current assessment practices, particularly the lack of standardized tools designed for diverse populations and insufficient reliability in existing motor intelligence assessments. The implications of these findings emphasize the need for ongoing research to develop effective assessment tools that accurately reflect the cognitive abilities of children with special needs. This study contributes to the existing knowledge based by identifying effective cognitive assessment methodologies and highlighting areas for future research.
References
Aljunied, M., & Frederickson, N. (2011). Cognitive indicators of different levels of special educational support needs in autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(4), 1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.05.002
Barida, M., & Muarifah, A. (2019). Assessment implementation to detect children with special needs in inclusive school. In 3rd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2019) (pp. 248–252). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-19.2019.9
Billard, C., Thiébaut, É., Gassama, S., Touzin, M., Thalabard, J., Mirassou, A., … & Münnich, A. (2021). The computerized adaptable test battery (BMT-i) for rapid assessment of children's academic skills and cognitive functions: A validation study. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 9, 656180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.656180
Bosma, T., & Resing, W. C. M. (2006). Dynamic assessment and a reversal task: A contribution to needs-based assessment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X42178
Carrasumada, S., Vendrell, R., Ribera, G., & Montserrat, M. (2006). Cognitive processes related to counting in students with special educational needs. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(5), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250600600778
Davison, J., Maguire, S., McLaughlin, M., & Simms, V. (2022). Involving adolescents with intellectual disability in the adaptation of self-reported subjective well-being measures: Participatory research and methodological considerations. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 66(7), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12936
Don, A., & O’Byrne, P. (2020). Exploring how the diagnostic process stratifies children with intellectual disability navigating the service system in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 26(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629520954765
Egilson, S. T., & Coster, W. J. (2004). School Function Assessment: Performance of Icelandic students with special needs. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120410020737
Erickson, K. A., & Geist, L. A. (2016). The profiles of students with significant cognitive disabilities and complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(4), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1213312
Esposito, M., Sloan, J., Tancredi, A., Gerardi, G., Postiglione, P., Fotia, F., Napoli, E., Mazzone, L., Valeri, G., & Vicari, S. (2017). Using tablet applications for children with autism to increase their cognitive and social skills. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(5), 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12372
Hajovsky, D. B., Villeneuve, E. F., Reynolds, M. R., Niileksela, C. R., Mason, B. A., & Shudak, N. J. (2018). Cognitive ability influences on written expression: Evidence for developmental and sex-based differences in school-age children. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.09.001
Kessel, R., Walsh, S., Ruigrok, A., Holt, R., Yliherva, A., Kärnä, E., … & Román-Urrestarazu, A. (2019). Autism and the right to education in the EU: Policy mapping and scoping review of Nordic countries Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. Molecular Autism, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0290-4
Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2021). Effect of game-based cognitive training programs on cognitive learning of children with intellectual disabilities. Applied Sciences, 11(18), 8582. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188582
Koutrouba, K., Vamvakari, M., & Steliou, M. (2006). Factors correlated with teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of students with special educational needs in Cyprus. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250600956162
Lawrence, N., & Cahill, S. (2014). The impact of dynamic assessment: An exploration of the views of children, parents and teachers. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12060
Lee, K., & Luellen, J. (2020). Long-term Head Start impacts on cognitive outcomes for children with disabilities. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 102(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389420926131
Lu, F., Li, P., & Zeng, F. (2024). Exploration of a somatosensory interactive assessment tool for children with intellectual disabilities. Psych Journal, 13(5), 804–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.759
Munoz, R., Villarroel, R., Barcelos, T. S., Riquelme, F., Quezada, A., & Bustos-Valenzuela, P. (2018). Developing computational thinking skills in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder through digital game programming. IEEE Access, 6, 33864–33872. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877417
Nusser, L., & Weinert, S. (2017). Appropriate test-taking instructions for students with special educational needs. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.16.3.227
Park, H., McCormick, M., Guo, S., Liu, J., & Park, J. (2023). Using a social-ecological framework to examine the cognitive development of elementary school children in the U.S. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3419169/v1
Peyton, C., Wroblewski, K., Park, J., Crisante, C., Mariano, K., Lyon, N., Baker, C. P., Rogers, B. T., Roistacher, J., Carter, F. A., Msall, M. E., Troyke, S., Gatling, C., & Tu, H. (2021). Validity of the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA-FS): A daily activity criterion checklist for infants and toddlers. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 63(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16093
Rebello, C., Siegel, M., Freyermuth, S., Witzig, S., & İzci, K. (2011). Development of embedded assessments for learning in biotechnology: Results and design process for dissemination. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20579
Reesman, J. H., Day, L. A., Szymanski, C. A., Hughes-Wheatland, R., Witkin, G. A., & Kalback, S. R. (2014). Review of intellectual assessment measures for children who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Psychologist, 69(6), 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035829
Rzhanova, I. E., Alekseeva, O. S., Britova, V. S., & Burdukova, Y. A. (2025). Fluid intelligence in children with learning disabilities. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2025.0102
Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Chadwick, O., Gringras, P., Wood, N., Higgins, S., Maney, J.-A., Karia, N., Iqbal, H., & Moore, A. (2020). Trajectories in symptoms of autism and cognitive ability in autism from childhood to adult life: Findings from a longitudinal epidemiological cohort. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(3), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.11.020
Smith, N., Smith, M., Gibson, N., Imms, C., Thornton, A., & Harvey, A. (2022). Pain coping tools for children and young adults with a neurodevelopmental disability: A systematic review of measurement properties. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 65(3), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15410
Syriopoulou-Delli, C., & Gkiolnta, E. (2021). Robotics and inclusion of students with disabilities in special education. Research, Society and Development, 10(9), e36210918238. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18238
Wee, Y., & Lee, O. (2023). Proposal for a sensory integration self-system based on an artificial intelligence speaker for children with developmental disabilities: Pilot study. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 17(4), 1216–1232. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2023.04.010
Zaheer, A., Anis, F., & Shahzad, M. (2023). Early childhood special education: A hope for lost oysters. QJSS, 4(4), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.280877582
Zaino, M., Shaaban, E. E., Shubayr, N., & El-Setouhy, M. (2025). Adapting and validating a motor intelligence assessment tool for children with intellectual disabilities: Prioritizing movement and sensory-motor integration. Lifescience Global, 14, 161–180. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2025.14.17
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal on Studies in Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
