The Regulating and Mediating Roles of Digital Competencies on Science Literacy in PISA: The Impacts of ICT Use within and beyond School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.5954Keywords:
PISA, ICT Literacy, Digital Literacy, Science LiteracyAbstract
Although information and communication technologies (ICT) in education has been widely studied, the specific ways digital competencies and varying ICT use patterns influence science literacy remain insufficiently underexplored. The rapid evolution of the digital age has made ICT an essential component of learning, yet effective digitalization requires more than technological access, it demands the development of students’ digital competencies, encompassing skills in information access, analysis, communication, and problem-solving. These competencies are vital not only for academic success but also for participation in a technology-driven society. Science education offers a critical setting for exploring this relationship, as it inherently fosters both digital competencies and science literacy, defined as the capacity to understand, evaluate, and apply scientific knowledge in real-world contexts. International assessments such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) demonstrate the importance of digital tools in enhancing scientific reasoning and conceptual understanding. However, the extent to which different ICT use contexts, within school, beyond school, and across time, mediate or regulate the impact of digital competencies on science literacy remains unclear. This study investigates (1) the direct effects of students’ digital competencies on science literacy, (2) the mediating roles of digital inquiry-based learning (ICTINQ) and subject-related ICT use (ICTSUBJ), and (3) the regulating roles of extracurricular ICT use (ICTECA), regulated school use (ICTREG), and temporal use patterns (ICTWKDY, ICTWKEND). By clarifying these relationships, the research addresses a critical gap in understanding how digital engagement supports scientific reasoning and problem-solving in modern education.
References
Araujo, A. de, Papadopoulos, P. M., McKenney, S., & Jong, T. de. (2024). A learning analytics‐based collaborative conversational agent to foster productive dialogue in inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13007
Ba, S., Hu, X., & Stein, D. (2024). Anatomizing online collaborative inquiry using directional epistemic network analysis and trajectory tracking. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13441
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Bell, R. L., Gess-Newsome, J., & Luft, J. A. (2010). Technology in science teacher education: An international perspective. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20340
Bers, M. U. (2010). The role of digital technologies in supporting inquiry-based learning in the science classroom. Computers in Education, 54(3), 555–562.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381451-1.00002-6
Bybee, R. W. (2010). The teaching of science: 21st-century perspectives. Science Education International, 21(4), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20414
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842
Dede, C., Salzman, M. C., & Loftin, R. B. (1996). ScienceSpace: Virtual realities for learning complex and abstract scientific concepts. IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRAIS.1996.490534
de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9225-2
Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2006). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x
Effectiveness of a Digital Health Game Intervention on Early Adolescent Smoking Refusal Self-Efficacy. (2024). Health Education & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981241237788
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen's vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.764261
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190658-en
Göçemen, B. (2023). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel okuryazarlık özyeterlikleri, evrensel fen okuryazarlılıkları ve dijital okuryazarlık öz-yeterlilikleri arasındaki ilişki. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Açık Erişim Arşivi.
Hämäläinen, R., De Wever, B., Nissinen, K., & Cincinnato, S. (2018). What makes the difference: PIAAC as a resource for understanding the problem-solving skills of Europe's higher-education adults. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2018.1463805
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2023). The impact of inquiry-based learning on students' scientific process skills and attitudes towards science.
Hinostroza, J. E., Mellar, H., & Espinosa, M. (2016). ICT in education: Policies and practices in Latin America and Asia. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 416–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.013
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2013). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to awareness and learning? Computers & Education, 65, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.001
Kozma, R. B. (2011). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 671–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.528104
Liao, Y. W., & She, H.-C. (2009). Enhancing eighth grade students’ scientific conceptual change and scientific reasoning through a web-based learning program. Educational Technology & Society.
Linn, M. C., Gerard, L., Matuk, C., & McElhaney, K. (2014). Science learning and inquiry with technology: A framework for learning with technology. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9301-2
Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Zhang, B. H., So, H. J., Chen, W., & Wong, L. H. (2011). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 680–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.011
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
Mamun, Md. A. A. (2022). Fostering self-regulation and engaged exploration during the learner-content interaction process: The role of scaffolding in the online inquiry-based learning environment. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-11-2021-0195
Maxim, S. (2023). Operationalizing collaborative problem-solving skills: A framework for assessment and development in the digital age. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Psychologia.
Miller, J. D. (2014). The measurement of science literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 767–784.
Milner-Bolotin, M. (2023). Investigating student collaborative problem-solving competency and science achievement with multilevel modeling: Findings from PISA 2015. PLOS ONE.
Nasırcı, H., & Kerkez, B. (2023). PISA'da başarılı ülkeler ile Türkiye'nin K12 beceriler çerçevesine göre karşılaştırmalı analizi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi.
Passey, D. (2014). Inclusive technology enhanced learning: Overcoming cognitive, physical, emotional, and geographic challenges. Computers & Education, 72, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.001
Rahman, F., Suyidno, S., Miriam, S., & Husain, S. (2023). Developing learners' digital literacy through guided discovery learning on the matter of work and energy. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains).
Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. European Commission.
Rohde, J., Marciniak, M. A., Henninger, M., Homan, S., Ries, A., Paersch, C., Friedman, O., Brown, A. D., & Kleim, B. (2024). Effects of a digital self-efficacy training in stressed university students: A randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305103
Sam, R. (2024). Systematic review of inquiry-based learning: Assessing impact and best practices in education. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155367.1
Sánchez, I., & Cortés Orduna, M. (2024). Possibilities and challenges of STEAM pedagogies. ArXiv.
Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2015). Revisiting the concept of digital competence: The role of technology-mediated assessments. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.912627
She, H.-C., & Liao, Y. W. (2010). Bridging scientific reasoning and conceptual change through adaptive web-based learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.20309
Sotiriou, S., Lazoudis, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Inquiry-based learning and e-learning: How to serve high and low achievers. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00130-x
Szigethy, E., Wolfson, D., Sinclair-McBride, K., Williams, K., Jhe, G., Lee, E. H., Bialostozky, M., Wallace, M. L., Bhatnagar, S., DeMaso, D. R., Yealy, D. M., & Hollenbach, K. A. (2023). Efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: Protocol for randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067141
Taba, M., Allen, T. B., Caldwell, P. H. Y., Skinner, S. R., Kang, M., McCaffery, K., & Scott, K. M. (2022). Adolescents’ self-efficacy and digital health literacy: A cross-sectional mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13599-7
Temel Aslan, S. (2024). Fen bilgisi eğitimi alanında okuryazarlık ile ilgili yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi (2014–2023). International Journal of Eurasia Social Studies.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2016). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 95, 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.001
Turmo, M. P. (2023). Digital cognitive maps for scientific knowledge construction in initial teacher education. RIED: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.2.36067
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st-century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.002
Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, S., & Van den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/11517
Zhang, F., Brynildsrud, H., Papavlasopoulou, S., Sharma, K., & Giannakos, M. N. (2024). Where inquiry-based science learning meets gamification: A design case of Experiverse. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2024.2433058
Zhang, X., & Liu, S. (2016). A study on ICT integration in teaching: An investigation of levels of use and reasons behind the gap in Hong Kong primary schools. Computers & Education, 95, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal on Studies in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
